Services · Evaluation and program design

Evaluation and program design

Program evaluation, curriculum and credential design, and facilitation

Program evaluation

Is the program working, and for whom?

I work with your team to set evaluation questions, develop instruments, and collect data across the life of the program. I offer both formative and summative evaluation, with scopes ranging from a retrospective evaluation of a completed program to end-to-end evaluation.

You get
An evaluation plan, survey and interview instruments, interim findings, and a final report written for funders and program staff
Good fit
Grant-funded programs that need an external evaluator
See a sample evaluation report →

Program and curriculum design

What should this program teach, and how?

I develop or co-develop curricula, credentials, and training programs grounded in published research, grey literature, and new data where it is needed, working alongside your faculty or subject matter experts

You get
Competency frameworks, course and module outlines, and credential structures
Good fit
Certificates and microcredentials, apprenticeships, and professional development programs

Facilitation

How do we get useful answers from the right people?

Interviews, focus groups, expert panels, and advisory board sessions, designed so the conversation produces data you can use. I am comfortable in rooms that mix technical experts, leadership, funders, and program officers.

You get
Protocols, facilitated sessions, and a written synthesis
Good fit
Standards and credentialing panels, advisory boards, and stakeholder workshops

How I work

The same five steps, whether the data are 20 interviews or 20,000 survey comments. I can work as autonomously or collaboratively as your team needs.

  1. Scope the question

    We agree on what you need to know and what decision it will inform

  2. Design the study

    I choose the methods, sample, and instruments that can answer that question

  3. Collect the data

    Interviews, focus groups, surveys, or existing records

  4. Analyze

    By hand, with LLM-assisted workflows, or both, with LLM coding checked against mine before it is used

  5. Report back

    Findings in the format your team will use: a report, a briefing, or a working session

Have a question that needs evidence behind the answer?